Showing posts with label LCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LCC. Show all posts

14 July 2025

“Too Big to Taxi?” – Is it Time to Break Up Qantas?


 

Let’s stop pretending Qantas is just a well-run airline. It’s not. 

It’s a state-protected cartel masquerading as a national icon, and it’s time someone said so — plainly and without genuflecting to the ghost of Alan Joyce. Oh yes and should we be talking about that horrendous data leak? Despicable behaviour.

Right now, Qantas Group — including its loyal attack pawn Jetstar — commands the air like a medieval baron controls trade routes. Not just with pricing power, but with institutionalized privilege that chokes new entrants, stalls innovation, and ensures that real competition is left to die quietly on the tarmac.

Let me explain and give a little colour.

Jetstar vs Virgin: A “Competition” In Name Only

Jetstar doesn’t just compete — it crushes. It’s the terminator of Australia’s low-cost aviation. When Bonza collapsed in 2024, Jetstar barely blinked. When Tigerair folded in 2020, Qantas actually bragged. Meanwhile, Virgin Australia, once a vibrant mid-tier competitor, was brought to its knees during COVID and only narrowly avoided death via a US buyout from Bain Capital (who did very nicely thank you).

Today, Australia’s domestic market is effectively a two-horse race: Qantas/Jetstar and a bruised but recovering Virgin. Together, they carry 94–95% of passengers. That’s not a market. That’s an oligopoly with press releases.

And if you’re a traveller? You’re footing the bill. The ACCC itself reported a 22.6% increase in airfares compared to pre-pandemic levels — and yet it seems strangely unwilling to confront the beast it helped fatten. And go check. The price to fly in Oz is one of the highest costs in the world. Indeed the prime trunk route is among the top 10 revenue earners on the planet.

Sydney Slots: Qantas’s House Always Wins

Let’s talk about Sydney Airport. For years, Qantas and Virgin literally ran the slot allocation system. They were the judges, jury, and executioners for who gets to fly and when. And wouldn’t you know it? They just happened to gobble up all the peak-time slots, leaving crumbs for challengers.

Even after the government finally brought in independent management (ACL UK) in 2025, the damage was done. The old slot hoarding practices had already kneecapped Bonza and blocked Rex from meaningful expansion on major trunk routes. 

The solution - Western Sydney still has only a handful of airlines committed. Last time I checked that did not include the incumbents at SYD. 

You can paint it any way you want but the obviousness of the situation is that Qantas used the system to entrench its dominance and weaponized Sydney’s constraints to shut out competition. 

Where Was the ACCC? Hint: Holding a Wet Noodle

The ACCC (Australia's competition "watch dog" deserves more than criticism. It deserves a formal inquiry.

For years, it’s watched the domestic aviation market collapse into a stitched-up duopoly and offered little more than toothless press releases. In 2023, it even praised Qantas for “strong results” while noting fare increases and “limited competition.”

Where was the watchdog when Bonza was being slowly suffocated by an inability to access slots or secure fuel contracts at competitive rates? When Jetstar kept growing unimpeded? When Qantas was making billions in profit off the back of a hollowed-out market?

The regulator also declined to investigate any bad activity at Bonza which was altogether rather fishy.

Incompetence is one explanation. Regulatory capture is another. Those profits are obscene.

Government Picks Winners: The Case of Rex

And then there’s Rex Airlines. A regional workhorse now being publicly cuddled by the government. Direct investment and operational flexibility make Rex look increasingly like a state-sponsored favorite — even as other airlines bleed out without a lifeline.

This isn’t just favoritism. It raises a brutal question: Was the government’s selective support part of the reason Bonza failed?

Bonza’s U.S.-backed owners had flaws, sure. They launched aggressively into the territory. But without equitable slot access, meaningful government support, or regulatory advocacy, their demise was not a surprise — it was a foregone conclusion. 

Break Up the Qantas Group? Yes. And More.

So what to do? Is it time for some better consumer thinking? Yup

Let’s be clear. The call to break up Qantas is not radical — it’s overdue.

Jetstar should be spun off, and slot allocation should be re-audited under public scrutiny. We need strict limits on market concentration by route. Western Sydney Airport must be a proving ground for real new entrants, not a second playground for the duopoly.

We also need the ACCC to grow a spine — or be replaced.

Final Thought

Qantas may have painted a kangaroo on its tail, but its playbook is pure corporate monopolist. It thrives on barriers, privileges, and inertia. As a consumer, you’re not flying the flag. You’re paying the price. The unions too have some responsibility, they have been enabled to get paid industry leading salaries to keep them quiet.

It’s time to stop treating Qantas like royalty and start treating it like what it is: too big to taxi, too arrogant to compete, and too protected to fail.

Suggested Reading:


02 June 2010

Where Have All The Low Costs Gone?

I must be having a fit of deja vu or something even worse. I thought LCCs were supposed to be about low cost and eschewing the trappings of conventional airline services such as Big PSS systmes, Interline, FF marketing partners, Interline, Codeshare, Legacy GDS etc etc.

Here are the bigger news items:

WestJet, JeBlue and Volaris are all migrating (or have migrated) to Sabre from Navitaire.
jetBlue is doing a deal with AA and BA for codeshares and feeders.

Gol is joining IATA. It already participates in ARC.

So let's talk about interline...

Not content there:

Air France-KLM and Jetstar sign interline agreement. Agreement covers the 60-odd destinations served by Jetstar, Jetstar Asia/Valueair and Jetstar Pacific, as well as Air France and KLM gateways Paris and Amsterdam.

Jetstar has also announced deals with LH

Virgin Blue are sharing across the Tasman sea with ANZ

Even Air Asia and Jetstar are doing deals with Delta for FF use. Check this out!!!



Am I missing something or is there a quiet revolution going on....

What I find interesting here is that there is a downside to all of this - the use of the more expensive distribution tools such as these things are beginning to drag down the profitability of the LCCs. Yet this week LCC champ Ryanair once again showed us that the true LCC model is very much alive. And very profitable now thank you very much.

Perhaps now that everyone is flush with cash they will spend a little to assess the true cost of these programs.

iPads all round anyone?

Cheers

01 November 2009

Why and How TMCs Hate LCCs.

As an observer of the Travel Industry I have watched the different sections of the value chain behave in different ways. Of late I have been thinking about the whole value chain and in what ways different parts of it are affected by fragmentation of content and differentiation of customer needs and providers capabilities. In looking at the corporate market it has somewhat worried me that the typical TMC has shunned the LCC market. It seems that even when the LCC footprint is pretty significant (the top two branded airlines on the planet are both LCCs – WN and FR) TMCs have shunned them and vice versa. I am not going to debate who shunned who first but it is still a pretty interesting view.

It seems to me that TMCs have done a remarkable job in deflecting the basic need to provide the corporate customer with the full product as a neutral provider in exchange for operational efficiency and service excellence.

This is an interesting concept but this blinding flash of inspiration came from one of my fellow Professor’s who wishes to remain anonymous. But that is a pretty fundamental view that on reflection I now whole heartedly agree with.

So how do they do this? Firstly their almost unhealthy relationship with the GDSs and tying themselves to the legacy model has resulted in a shunning of LCC products. The focus on “saving money” sends them into deep activity on intra product as opposed to inter product (to wit – getting the best price on the itinerary booked vs checking first whether the trip is necessary and secondly what is the most efficient way to address the needs that drove the trip request in the first place).

Then the lack of attempt at providing a service proposition to LCCs by the TMCs seems to be a significant failing on their part. Being passive while airlines such as Jetstar says let the customer book direct only seems to indicate an unwillingness to embrace the LCCs and help the customer to make a decision about the most efficient way to get from A to B. I am sure there will be TMCs who will say that this is not true and that the real problem is the unwillingness of the LCC to play ball with the TMCs. Well I think that argument is academic. The issue is the fact that little is done by the TMCs.

The promotion of operational excellence is almost tied to the concept that the legacy airlines have in differentiating their products when in reality it really is a commodity. TMCs don’t want to stray outside of the box because it means that they would have to do more work and pay for something. So the legacy TMC model doesn’t endear itself to the servicing of LCCs. Even though the customer would ultimately save money by using the LCC more frequently. One could also say that TMCs are too operationally focused - just like legacy airlines are.

So chaps – the continued shunning of each other (TMCs and LCCs) is set to stay. But given the amount of possible market share that LCCs command – this cannot continue. The mature US based TMCs now have only a few pockets of pure LCC activity. However Europe has a very large LCC footprint where in quite a few cases the ONLY option is an LCC. The TMCs (and their attendant service partners) therefore must change their position or risk seeing themselves disintermediated as a result.

Recent efforts by Travelport and others to bring LCCs to the GDS environment have only shown that the GDS model is increasingly flawed. With AA now moving to a 100% pure direct model - can the TMCs ignore the LCCs any longer. That does not require an answer.

Food for thought?

12 September 2009

So A Quiz - Which EU Based Flag Carrier Is Weakest in Its Home Market

So let me be specific.

Which European based airline that is a legacy/flag carrier is weakest in its home market? For many years this used to be KLM.

So lets use the metrics that we know and love - I will cheat and use the share of scheduled flights. This means that there is a considerable amount of capacity that is not included in our search - but lets press on.

Lets start with the 5 top markets to simplify matters:

These are for originating traffic:

UK
Germany
Spain
France
Italy.

1. Lets now look at which airlines enjoy a dominant position in that market - IE 50% of total capacity. Answer? Just one - Air France (excluding KLM).
2. Now lets look at which Flag carriers are bigger than their low cost rivals. Answer all but the UK where BA is now relegated to second place behind Ryanair. Indeed at just 17% it is the lowest market share of any airline.
3. Where do all LCCs form bigger than Legacy airlines? Add Spain and Italy although Spain doesn't really count because New Vueling is mostly controlled by Iberia.

Still this is an interesting trend!!!

If we look at the next tier of markets (12 in all) then the numbers have the same characteristics, so for the following markets:

Norway
Greece
Netherlands
Switzerland
Sweden
Portugal
Ireland
Austria
Finland
Belgium
Denmark
Poland

1. Of Flag carriers only one has a Flag Carrier rate higher than 50% (Finland)
2. Countries where Flag Carrier is smaller than one LCC alone (Ireland - Ryanair, Greece - Aegean, Norway - Norwegian, Poland - Wizz)
3. Countries where Flag Carrier is smaller than combined LCCs (above plus Sweden)

Fun to think of this right? Oh yes the answer in case you missed it was BA.

Cheers

Source OAG Max w/c 7 Sept 2009.

24 February 2009

Air Arabia Steps Gingerly Into Europe

Most folks in North America and in Europe have never heard of Air Arabia. It never seems to quite make anyone's list. Yet it is today a powerhouse in the GCC states. It is today probably the most profitable airline in the world with yields that most legacy airlines can only have fantasies about.

It has built an extensive network feeding the the GCC markets into Southern Asia and even beyond. It has steadfastly avoided stepping into the territory of the European based LCCs. Well dream no more. Air Arabia has announced its first Western European destination - Athens. Albeit with a very modest 3x a week ATH-SHJ service. This will not be the last of their European destinations.

With Dubai's new LCC - FlyDubai rearing to go this year - Air Arabia must spread its wings and continue to develop more cross feed and keep ahead of the its Emirates neighborhood cousin who is surely going to make a big impact in the LCC market arena when it arrives later this year.

While technically not its first flights to Europe (the carrier already serves Istanbul and Kiev) this is the first step into a major European gateway.

Welcome to Adel Ali and his team. it would be interesting to see if Ryanair is going to fly to Sharjah! I wouldn't put it past the Irish.

Cheers

30 December 2008

Psst Want A Free Steak Dinner On Southwest?

In the category of sure win bets - WN CEO Gary Kelly is offering a steak dinner to anyone who can prove that Southwest Airlines does not carry more domestic business travelers than any U.S. carrier.

Southwest Airlines' CEO thinks this is a sure fire win and that he'll never have to pay up. So since the Professor's readers are an ornery lot - I throw down the gauntlet and I will supplement it with a bottle of wine - if anyone does!

Actually its going to be pretty hard because there are few ways to prove him wrong because most airlines don't know the real purposes of many customers' trips. However I think its still possible. With WN the largest domestic airline at well over 100 million trips, Kelly maintains that internal research shows the airline is already No. 1 in US domestic business travel. He is banking on Southwest to capture even more of the business-travel market in 2009. To accomplish that, he's doing some heavy tinkering with a business model that has kept the airline profitable for an unprecedented 35 consecutive years.

However - the end of the egalitarian model that we predicted in 2008 and a move to hybridization does stand the risk of alienating some of the existing customer base. But this will have little impact on WN's growth as the other airlines keep cutting their US domestic ops.

In my opinion this is leading to a large hole in the US market for a next gen LCC to capture trunk and regional business in primary and secondary markets. Actually the opportunity is growing so fast that there is a chance for more than one. The reduction of capacity over the last 12 months is big enough to allow a new airline to build a single hub based operation the size of Alaska Airlines.

Think about it.

Oh yes... and call me when you are having that Steak Dinner - I want to be there just to watch and buy the wine for the two of you...

Cheers

01 December 2008

Indigo a sinking ship?

Indigo - the Indian LCC controlled by family interests associated ITG - Interglobe Technologies and former Worldspan CEO Rakesh Gangwal, has seen its 2 top execs leave in less than 6 weeks.

First to go was its COO. On October 23rd, USA3000 today announced that Steven E. Harfst has been named its first President and Chief Executive Officer, effective Nov. 10th, 2008. Mr. Harfst replacing Angus Kinnear who recently retired as USA3000's Chief Operating Officer. Harfst was previously COO of Indigo and prior to that CEO of North American Airlines.

Today, Saudi Arabian LCC Sama named Bruce Ashby CEO, replacing Andrew Cowen. Ashby formerly was president and CEO of IndiGo and US Airways executive VP-marketing and planning. SAMA has been bleeding red ink and its management team led by Andrew Cowen from Mango Aviation Partners has been struggling to come terms with a very different LCC market of Saudi Arabia.

It is no secret that all Indian carriers have posted large losses. Indigo while well funded initially, must be hurting. It has delayed and slowed delivery of new Airbuses - currently just 22 of its initial 100 firm orders have been completed. Rakesh is probably beginning to wonder if his bailout from Worldspan was that great.

Bruce Ashby is stepping from the frying pan into the fire. Just 2 weeks ago SAMA launched its flights from KSA to India. probably not the best time. SAMA is still struggling to find its grove.

Thanks to Canadian Professor Bryan for this tip.

Cheers

07 November 2008

Euro LCCs: A Quantam of..?

The big 3 European Low Cost Carriers have reported their October traffic numbers. They make for interesting reading.

Here are the numbers.

Ryanair carried 5.35m passengers last month, 18% more than in October 2007, taking its rolling 12-month total to 56.8m. October load factor was flat at 85% and on a rolling 12-month basis averaged 81.5%. They have already announced significant cut backs for the Winter months that could see capacity fall by as much as 25%.

For easyJet, October passenger numbers grew by a similar 18.4% to 3.96m, taking its rolling 12-month total to 44.27m (+17.6%). October loads were 1.4 percentage points ahead at 83.9%, and on a rolling 12-month basis 0.5pp ahead at 84.2%. Thus continuing their LF trends higher than their Irish rival.

Alas on the mainland things don't look so good. Passenger numbers at Air Berlin declined by 4.4% year-on-year to 2.7m last month, due to a ‘targeted capacity reduction’ of about 80,000 seats. Load factor dropped 1.6% to 80.1%. Still pretty healthy Air Berlin seems to have stabilized at about half the traffic of Ryanair.

For other airlines in the LCC category things are not looking too good. XL Airways (UK) and Zoom both left the field followed by Sterling last month. But bright spots from the UK include traffic growth at Jet2, and Monarch Scheduled. There is continued uncertainty in Germany over the fate of the musical chairs game being played out with TUI/Thomas Cook/Euro Wings+German Wings and Lufthansa. Air Berlin's ability to play has been weakened by their need to absorb all the hodge podge of traffic they acquired with LTU, DBA etc. The latter of which is no longer an entity.

Cheers

More Evidence of HVC and UPC Convergence

Oh creeps... this alphabet soup is getting worse.

For some time I have been speaking of Low Cost and Legacy airlines morphing into HVC - Hybrid Value Carriers. As LCCs mature - many of them seem to fall prey to wanting to become - well Legacy Airlines.

2 Good examples of this are the following:

Mango (South Africa) has just launched its business product - it now offers two packages of products - Mango Flex and Mango Plus. Yes friends - once again the airlines are showing their true colors by well confusing the consumers.

Meanwhile back in the USA - the newly mega-sized Delta has given in to its baser instincts (and profit motive) and adopted Northwest's baggage policy. The numbers are just too compelling to resist. So effective immediately $15 for the first bag and $25 for the second will now apply. Last week when I flew on Delta - I asked one of the CSRs at check in whether they thought charging was a good idea. Her response was - she hoped DL never charged - her colleagues at the other airlines all felt it was counter productive and caused greater customer service hassles and longer times not shorter to process customers. Well so much for that then!

There are hidden costs in the unbundling of the product. UPC airlines I believe will prevail but I still firmly believe that there is a building overhang of unhappy customers, staff and then there is the taxman...

Hmm we shall see - maybe sooner than later

Cheers

30 October 2008

Consumers Embracing Airline Charges?

One could infer this conclusion judging by the latest results. Airlines are now (almost) all drinking the coolaid of the Ancillary revenue model. Happy bunnies all, the airlines declare that they have finally found their ability to make money from the business model by resorting to their time honored tradition of pricing obfuscation. Only this time it seems to be working. Better than a fuel surcharge – better than an attempted rate hike. Of course there are even those like Robert Buckman, aviation futurist (say what???) and director of airline distribution strategy for Miami-based Amadeus North America who say that Consumers will eventually embrace unbundled pricing. Let’s just say I think he is speaking out of a non-verbal part of his body.

In this article from Travel Weekly: http://www.travelweekly.com/Article.aspx?id=181492 It can be clearly seen that there is a ton of money to be made by following the formula of hiding the true cost of the service and adding to the cost to the consumer.. Thus new and old airlines are now ALL UPCs – Unbundled Pricing Carriers .

So the impact seems to be really great for the airlines and the Wall Street Analysts. But what of the customer and the other businesses/entities that depend on the business model? How are they going to work/live in this new world? Actually the answer is not so happy but in true Lemming like behavior – it may not matter. The consumers are now finding that they cannot predict the real price of the product they are purchasing. The per passenger model becomes harder to understand. Anyone depending on this (such as taxation authorities) are now seeing their model crumble. In a recent survey conducted by the NBTA - Most of 230 U.S. travel buyers responding to a July-September survey felt that airlines have been "misleading the public with the introduction of new fees." Forty-four percent said "apparent competitive fares end up being higher after all the fees are added." Fewer than 20 percent said airlines are not misleading the public. Clearly the travel managers are unhappy in fact at a session I moderated in LA on GDSs in August at the NBTA national convention, this was indeed a hot topic then.

Behavior of the consumer is not however changing. At least we are not yet seeing perceptible changes in behavior from the passengers as would be indicated in their flocking to those who have reduced or not yet implemented fees. While we can expect some benefit for Southwest who is still hawking their non-fee story – we are not seeing significant growth or share shift to Delta who was not a swift adopter of fees. So it is beginning to look like the airlines have found nirvana and a way to raise revenues without touching market share. Remember that the airlines have not yet rolled back the fuel surcharges to the levels they were at before the price of oil skyrocketed.

So now something needs to be done. Finally – the authorities are going to have to look at this. The numbers are staggering. Upwards of $1 billion per airline can now come from the non passenger ticket revenue. OK This is extreme but I am making a point. Air Canada has perfected an unbundled model. Its revenue goals seem to be modest. Currently generating $73 million as opposed to United’s mammoth $1 billion.

From our point of view this is short term win thinking. It is also going to end in tears despite its popularity. I believe that 2009 we will see several initiatives to curtail the model of unbundled pricing. In no market has this type of behavior ever been successful. Long term we will reach a level of acceptance but be careful what you wish for… it may just happen and you won’t like the results. I predict that a battle will ensue in which certain OTA or Meta Search engines will figure out how to display a true cost of product and that users pick up of this information will eventually force all channels to display true pricing. Further the various government authorities – such as the European Community – will force full true price disclosure. A passenger bill of rights will then appear in the USA. Finally the various local and national bodies who depend on the airlines for taxation type revenue will also force the airlines to start handing over cash with an ancillary revenue tax. Then we shall see equilibrium returning. Personally I hope we get back to full transparency in pricing – but judging from our continued coverage of airlines prices particularly international – I don’t see that happening.

Cheers

07 October 2008

American Introduces A la Carte Pricing



In their exhaustive and never ending search to lower YOUR travel costs - American is happily going to move to a la carte pricing. Thus you too will save money and the airline will be happy to help you pay for all those extras your previously enjoyed at NO CHARGE.

The success of the Tango/Tango Plus model at Air Canada and the extra yields that have come from the LCC's unbundled the cost of the airline ticket is driving AA to this remarkable decision.

So here is the formula:

Full Service Network Carriers - all frills = UPC - Unbundled Pricing Carrier.

Now all airlines can have the same nomenclature and peace is restored to the world.

So no more LCCs FSCs, Network or Legacy carriers, Hybrid (HVCs) or any other type of airline - now everyone is UPC.

Here are 2 articles from yesterday's newspapers on the subject:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/1310ap_airlines_unbundling.html
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/381854_airfare06.html

(Only read one - they are really the same).

Now there are of course issues here.

1. Government is being hit with a withdrawal of taxes. In the case of United it will be moving $52.5 million of potential tax receipts away from the ATFF.
2. Good luck getting a refund on these new charges
3. Good luck in understanding. One of the articles talks about credit being given for AC illustrating what the customer can do.

So I beg to differ on the issue of ease of understanding. For AC's transparency i submit a display Vancouver to Toronto. For how difficult it is compared to someoneelse's I submit Southwest's display LAX-Houston Hobby.

Same dates - as an experiment try this yourself at home. time yourself on how long it takes you to find the lowest fare on the page and the most expensive fare on the page for each carrier (IN COACH!!!).

It isn't easy... There is a famous quote by the Revenue Management guy at Air Canada who was heard bemoaning his worst problem was there were not enough letters in the alphabet!

So go figure...

This is going to be more obfuscation on airline pricing and more customer confusion, less government revenues and the GDS's dont have a prayer in keeping up.

Result - unhappy campers all round and more loss of airline brand equity.

Just the Professor's humble opinion.

Cheers

29 September 2008

Maybe Monday's are better - News Roundup

I thought I liked Fridays. Well this Monday is full of stories. So I will condense for the assembled masses with some commentary along the way.

1. Thomas Cook pulls out of German consolidation talks. So along with the patent's decision (or rather indecision) on its future the formation of a 3rd force in Germany looks set for the round file for a while. This in turn gives Air Berlin some breathing space to get its house in order. I shall be flying long haul on AB in 2 weeks - I will let you know what its like.

2. India - $1.5 billion market loss predicted by IATA out of $5.2 billion loss globally predicted for 2008. Bisignani is predicting a bloodbath for India unless a new regulator steps in. He could well be right. Already the premium paid for fuel in India is approximately 50%. The market is now experiencing negative growth (down 7.5% for the second half). This will impact not just the airlines but also the 4 major Online players in the market.

3. Kelleher calls for development of cheap 110-125 seater. Exhorting his "children" - Herb was waxing lyrically on two major topics. One was the regulation of ATC and the development of better processes and control in Europe. The other was the development of a low cost single aisle aircraft. Neither Boeing nor Airbus are keen to do this at the moment. More on this later when I have thought about it.

4. Low Cost Congress in London. Lots of news going on there - I hope to do a recap by the end of this week.

5. On Airline Bankruptcies... ABTN was calling for the CAA to learn how to be an Undertaker after the ludicrous handling of the XL failure. BTW Paddy says FlyGlobespan is next to go. Easing odds on Alitalia who has a respite until October 15th. I believe the CAA should be reformed and some of its functions divested. However I do agree with Malcolm that there needs to be a better handling of processes with regards to addressing big failures. The UK has not seen such a failure since the Court Line crash in the 1970s.

6. Pilot Charged with Mooning. A TransStates/United Express pilot was charged with being drunk and indecent behavior after he mooned traffic. The pilot told police officers he had an early morning flight, and he hoped the officers were happy because "50 people's flight would be delayed because of (Officer Dustin Cook, the arresting officer)," according to the news report. Makes you think carefully about flying on an RJ.

7. One of the big losers in the Wamu failure of course was TPG who saw their $1.5 billion investment wiped out. Looks like TPG will have a much harder time in raising capital for any major project. That means they will be sitting out on the sidelines for the foreseeable future. The impact on the BA -IB match up is yet to be determined.

There is more... but for now digest this lot!

Cheers

23 September 2008

South Africa - a Small market? Think Again!

The potential for Low Cost Carriers to reform a market remains one of the bright spots in these dark days. As if to prove it, Kulula in South Africa held a "garage sale" and in one day sold 55,000 tickets. That works out to about 350 Boeing 737s worth of tickets IN 18 HOURS.... that's about 1 Ticket a second.

So more power to Gidon and the lads for this one. If they can do it (remember this is a 62 YEAR OLD Company) then shame on anyone else who says they cannot.

Cheers

05 June 2008

International Low Cost - a True Mixed Bag

AirOne today signified it was going to be a big player in International Low Cost Air Travel by signing a big order for Airbus long range widebodies.

At the same time - Air Berlin is contemplating pulling out of all Long Haul flights. Wait a minute didn't they just buy LTU just for the Long Haul routes?

Jet2 is expanding into Long Haul with its 757s.

So this sounds like a very mixed bag at the moment. Much of the uncertainty is clearly being driven by the fuel cost but the maturing of the LCC model indicates that LCCs are now thinking beyond the box. However as my other post of today indicates, beware the siren call of the FSC Model.

Cheers

Timothy

09 May 2008

Sabre adopts T2's definition of Hybrid Value Carriers

Finally recognition!

Sabre's airline solutions team has acknowledged something that we have been saying for a very long time - the basic LCC model has evolved and there is a new kid on the block the HVC - Hybrid Value Carrier.

The core premise is that many other studies in LCCs have blinded concluded that the LCC model was rapidly growing and very large. From our analysis we believe the number of "purist" LCCs is actually quite small. Southwest for example is no longer a true LCC. Neither is EasyJet nor Virgin Blue.

T2 will shortly be publishing our annual LCC study. This year will be more focused on the business model and its evolution.

If you are interested in obtaining a copy of the last year's study based on Travel Trade and the LCCs or you would like a preview of this year's - please give me a ping on email. timothyo@t2impact.com

Cheers

Timothy

18 April 2008

Now will you stop calling WN a LCC? Southwest to codeshare with International Airlines

I frequently get irked when people call US airlines Low Cost Carriers - LCCs. Such an animal is a rarity in the US market. The only carrier who fulfilled the model was Skybus. Westjet (sort of!).

But let's be clear. Southwest has not been one for many years. Air Tran is not. US Airways definitely is not (despite its stock symbol). Frontier is not. JetBlue is not.

So anyone who says that the US LCC market is approaching 30% (yes that means the Spin Doctors at Delwest) is smoking something.

'Nuff said?

Timothy

09 April 2008

Oasis Hong Kong Files for Bankruptcy - stops flying

They just couldn't quite make it.

After a rocky start - the airline built a loyal following but with just 2 routes and the oil price/recession combo - the airline couldn't quite break out of startup mode.

There will be a lot of soul searching this morning as this is the 5 airline in 10 days to bite the dust.

Cheers

Timothy

19 February 2008

Meet The New Profit Champ - Air Arabia

Move over Ryanair, Easyjet, Air Asia and Gol. Say hello to the new king.

OK so my mathematical skills are not always the best but I think I can use a spreadsheet. (Should anyone be able to prove me wrong I will immediately retract this story!)

It looks like we have a new Champion in the airline yield stakes. Its one that most people in Europe and the US - probably Asia have never even heard of let alone flown on.

Its Air Arabia.

For its 2007 results go here: http://www.airarabia.com/Air%20Arabia%20Net%20Profit%20Soars%20to%20AED%20376%20million.html

Frankly the numbers really shocked me. I was expecting a good result but this was very good. So net yield is 29.3% vs 13.5% last year. That is pretty much at the highest I have seen in any carrier. Higher even than Ryanair (2006 FR's numbers put them at the top of the Airline Business profitability league with 21.1% yield). With fares at about the right level for a Low Cost Carrier ($130 each way) they are doing a lot right.

Congrats to Adel Ali and his team.

Cheers

Timothy

10 December 2007

Sabre Opening Up to LCCs

The battle ground for the love of LCCs and HVCs has just become a little more interesting. As regular readers know we are strong believers in the emergence of Hybrid (HVC) airlines. Thus far the game has been some what interesting. But recently we have seen Amadeus making a big play for LCCs while at the same time Sabre has been sitting on the sidelines. Now Sabre has come out with all guns blazing.

Will this be enough? It will depend signficantly on the costs. So the battle is now joined. Galileo - where are you in all this?

To see the Sabre press release go here: http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=73098&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1085638&highlight=

Cheers

Timothy